Monday, December 16, 2013

Ending the year on a high note

Image Source: vancouversun.com

For most people, the countdown to the New Year has already started. Given this, people are already on holiday mode. And with parties left and right, work productivity, unfortunately, takes a back seat. Last-minute vacation planning and gift-buying top the list of concerns for most employees. After all, work will begin again in the coming year.


However, for employees who intend to race past their peers in getting that raise or promotion, they need to finish the year strong. They could set themselves apart from the rest of the pack by giving that final push. They could do so by creating their own yearend goals and sticking to deadlines. Their guiding philosophy is: Be the new you now.


Image Source: lifealchemyblog.com

Though it may be difficult to keep the pace at times especially when everyone else is slowing down, what employees may do is vary their daily routine. For example, they could switch their daily cup of black coffee with a holiday blend on some days.


They could embrace the holiday mood, too. A positive attitude will certainly help when tackling tasks, so it is best to smile and bring cheer to colleagues. If for the most part of the year things have been difficult in the office, the best time to make up for it is by ending the year in good spirits.


Image Source: climateforchangebook.com

Marc Accetta
is the founder of Marc Accetta Seminars. For years, he has been empowering lives through his life story. Follow this Twitter account to learn more about empowerment.

Monday, November 18, 2013

Getting one's work recognized

Image Source: ehow.com


Putting it simply: working hard and working smart are still the best things that professionals can do to get ahead in their career. It takes an extraordinary amount of effort and an abundant display of perseverance and dedication to one’s work to get noticed by the higher-ups and to be considered as a potential candidate for a leadership role. However, in spite of one’s efforts, there are still times when hard work somehow falls short.

For professionals who find that this situation applies to them, here are some tips on how they can get the recognition they deserve:


How to Recognize Employees for a Job Well Done
Image Source: statetechmagazine.com


1. Improve further. If a professional’s hard work and great attitude is not getting recognized within the organization, it may be because the level of his or her work is still only within expected or recommended levels. To break through, a worker may need to show more initiative to take on bigger responsibilities and to show willingness to learn other tasks.

2. Assess the organization’s values. An employee’s achievements at work may not be in line with the goals of the organization, and this could be why that worker hasn’t been recognized. Reviewing the organization’s values should reveal what types of achievements are valued by the managers which could help guide workers to devote more of their effort to tasks that matter.

3. Move to a different company. Finally, it may be that the organization simply does not value extraordinary employees. There are many dead end jobs in companies that don’t value innovation and initiative. If this is the case, then it is best for a highly motivated individual to just look for better opportunities in a company that doesn’t fault them for being enthusiastic about work.


Image Source: constructonomics.com


Marc Accetta is a life coach who continues to help others find ways to become successful at what they do. For more tips on self-improvement, follow this Facebook page.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Be in the condition to lead others to greatness

Image Source: iuced.org


The efforts of employees who are bent on improving their careers may eventually be recognized through promotions to leadership positions. However, not many may feel quickly at ease with their new roles. The responsibilities of a leader could be numerous and overwhelming, even for seasoned professionals.

It can be intimidating at first but, to achieve success, one just has to press forward while quickly developing the required skills to lead. However, the elements of effective leadership go beyond know-how of planning, organizing, and control.


Image Source: inc.com


One of the key leadership abilities is the aptitude for communication. Knowing the right thing to say and the right way to say it is vital to keeping the members of one’s team engaged and willing to give their full effort for the company’s goals. Having and maintaining a good attitude toward the work and toward others also allow a leader to become an inspiring presence instead of an icon of fear in the workplace.

The ability to support others is also important. Highly effective leaders are those that bring out the full potential of the company’s workforce. Increasing productivity is not achieved by forcing the workers to sacrifice for the company. It is accomplished by allowing workers to develop their own skills and abilities through opportunities for training and growth. Likewise, having the initiative to step in and offer solutions when things go wrong is expected of a leader, and anything less than alertness for the ground situation could be termed sleeping on the job.


Image Source: blog.automate.com


Find more articles about effective leadership through this Marc Accetta Twitter page.

Thursday, May 23, 2013

REPOST: Living the 7 Entrepreneurial Virtues

Kevin Daum shares advice on how entrepreneurs can strive for bigger and better things in their career. Read about them here:

Image source: inc.com


Last month, I shared how to avoid the 7 deadly entrepreneurial sins so you could innovate without fear. But entrepreneurs, and those who are entrepreneurial in their roles, aspire to live life beyond mere survival and safety. They strive for something bigger and more meaningful.

So here are descriptions of the 7 Heavenly Virtues for you entrepreneurial types to help you reach for the clouds.

1. Purity

Temptation is abundant in the entrepreneurial world. Most people are looking for shortcuts: a faster, easier way to take the market, get funding, lock down a client. Most shortcuts, if even effective for the long run, can come with a price. The best businesses are built on a solid foundation of integrity. Their business models are backed by research and tested to prove viability. Above all, the ethical choices you make will impact the respect and trust you retain in business for decades to come. Those who misrepresent to gain fast traction are doomed to follow in the footsteps of Enron. Better to be a Jeff Bezoz than a Kenneth Lay.

2. Temperance

Exuberance is a trait of many entrepreneurs and CEOs. They love to get excited and get people around them excited as well. But the leader who gets excited all the time about every little thing creates excitement fatigue. Followers begin to lose interest because they can't distinguish between actual major milestones and missteps.  A leader who shows self-restraint can pick the moments to generate enthusiasm. Moderation will help sustain energy that builds over time.

3. Charity

One doesn't have to give away their fortune to be charitable. Charity can come in other forms than money. The best and most respected leaders give their time, their energy, their thoughts, and their life lessons. But they do it now, they do it often and they do it with intent. They make a concerted effort to engage with those who have not yet achieved, and they do it selflessly.

4. Diligence

As one of my personal core values, the idea of diligence has helped me benefit from wonderful opportunities as it has protected me from bad ones. Entrepreneurial people are ready to jump at a moment's notice, but those who can comfortably step back, do their homework, and deliver with consistency will grow bigger and better every time.

5. Patience

Patience may be the hardest virtue for entrepreneurial types to master. Once a vision is finished in your head, you want it to exist tomorrow (or at least by next week.) But the best success is built over time. A business or process cultivated carefully over time will grow bigger, be more competitive, and last longer. Plant your seeds today and enjoy helping them grow. And if you feel anxious along the way, at least learn to manage your impatience productively.

6. Kindness

I have said many times that nice people will sabotage you in business. But as a New Yorker, I appreciate that you can be brutally honest and direct while still being kind. In fact, the kindest move you can often make is to save people from wasting their time and energy on a dead end campaign. Beyond that, a smile and a little tasteful humor at no one's expense will go along way to endear you to others.

7. Humility

Entrepreneurial people, born or made, are gifted leaders. It takes strength, power and a healthy ego to lead people into the unknown. But the act of being humble, best demonstrated though self-awareness and acknowledgement of others, is sure to have people following you to great heights for all the right reasons.


Marc Accetta continues to try and encourage other professionals to aim for higher goals in their careers.  Find more advice on personal improvement on this Twitter page.

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

REPOST: Can Founders Ever Achieve Work-Life Balance?

This Forbes.com article shares some ways on how to achieve balance in your daily routine. 


Image Source: forbes.com
As a time coach, I talk to people who want to live a more balanced life on a daily basis—including startup founders. It can be a struggle, but my real-world experience has uncovered that yes, founders can achieve work-life balance — IF all five of the following conditions are met:

1. They Want It: Not everyone wants traditional work-life balance, typically meaning that you have enough time for basic self-care like sleep, exercise and nutrition and connection with key people like friends and family members. Instead, as a time coach, I focus on trying to help entrepreneurs achieve their definition of work-life brilliance – meaning their time investment aligns with their priorities.

However, I can’t bring about lasting behavioral change if they don’t intrinsically want it.

2. They Believe It: To have true work-life balance, you need to not only believe it’s possible in a theoretical sense, but also believe it’s possible personally for you. In my experience, this belief comes from a combination of seeing an entrepreneur whom you relate to experiencing work-life balance and/or starting to attempt it yourself and witnessing positive results.

Without a sense of hope, it’s nearly impossible to stick it out through the uncomfortable process of breaking old habits and forming new ones. To make it through this difficult withdrawal stage, you need to have faith that the changes will really pay off in the end.

3. They Value It: We have a limited amount of time each day, and how we invest it determines what kind of life we create. Work-life balance comes at a professional cost for most people, but especially for founders. The choice to invest in activities outside of work may mean that you can’t start certain types of businesses, take on specific categories of funding, work with particular clients, or expand at as rapid a pace. For those who highly value life outside of work, these macro-level decisions that give them the opportunity to live a balanced life are worth the potential cost and risk to their business.

4. They Know How: Many people want, believe in, and value work-life balance, but they just don’t know how to change. If you’ve always seen startup founders work crazy hours, you don’t have good role models to show you how to behave in a balanced manner. And it’s hard to know how to think and act differently if you’ve always operated in one way. As the quote often attributed to Einstein goes: “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

5. They Can: After working with clients around the world with many different personality types, including some with ADD/ADHD, I believe that almost anyone who meets the above four criteria can see improvement in their work-life balance. But for people who thrive in high-pressure environments, achieving traditional work-life balance and moving their company forward effectively may or may not be possible to the same extent as others.

For individuals who fit this profile, the best strategy is to clarify action-based priorities in key areas such as seven hours of sleep a night, working out five days a week, or having family dinner six days a week. Then they need to focus on making these priorities into routines that allow them to consistently invest their time in these core areas while still keeping up a fairly high level of intensity in their work during the remaining hours.

Work-life balance is possible for founders who meet the above five criteria, but for those who don’t, it’s not.

Marc Accetta shares his passions with many people through his live seminars and coaching programs. Follow this Twitter page for more updates.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

The secrets to achieving entrepreneurial success



Image Source: moneyadviceservice.org.uk


Starting up a business on one’s own is not as easy as it looks, and many have gone home broke when the entrepreneurial venture of their dreams failed to take off. However, there are those who achieved success and were able to live out their dreams of entrepreneurial success.

Inc.com shows how these self-made entrepreneurial mavens were able to find success in the fast-paced world of entrepreneurship. Here are three of them:

Being kind to customers. Bob Moore of Bob’s Red Mill, a natural-foods chain in Milwaukee, Oregon, believes that customers should be treated with utmost respect. In addition, he agrees that the customer is always right, which probably made his store’s ordinary buyers into lifelong repeat customers and even business partners.


Image Source: thefizzbackblog.blogspot.com


Accountability is a good thing. Although Tim O’Reily was already head of O’Reilly Media, a publishing company located in Sebastopol, California, he hired a board of directors based on the advice of a management consultant. Tim believed that being accountable for something, no matter how high one’s position is, teaches great discipline.

Keeping a close eye on the product. Even though Justin Kan is busy with his work as the co-founder of Justin.tv, a video streaming site based in San Francisco, he still sticks close to the coding, which is the lifeblood of any web company, because he believes that it is next to impossible to manage somebody’s work if he doesn’t have intimate knowledge of how the work is actually done.


Image Source: ncsbdc.org


Many successful entrepreneurs have their own secrets to success, and it is very important for those who want to achieve the same level of success to take each and every one of them to heart.

Marc Accetta can teach you how to change your mind-set for you to have the successful career you’ve always wanted. Visit this website for more details.

Sunday, May 5, 2013

REPOST: Surprising secret to a satisfying and successful life with others

This Forbes.com article shares the benefits of giving..

Image Source: forbes.com
Tension was inevitable. The stakes were high. We all wanted to be accepted into this coveted fellowship program, yet only 20% would. After a series of intensive interviews, much depended on how we played this game.

The rules were odd. Eight strangers, all high-achievers, were seated at a round table, with five flat cardboard pieces in various shapes in front of each of us. Ten other just-formed teams of applicants sat at different tables in the same large meeting room. Observers with notepads were standing right behind us around each table.

Become More Beneficial With Savvy Prosocial Support

When the bell rang we were to give a piece to someone else in the group who would then be expected to give some piece back. We could not ask for a certain piece from someone else. All of us could be giving and receiving at the same time. The goal of each team member was to create a complete triangle shape out of the pieces they received. The winning team would be the first one in which every member had a completed triangle of pieces in front of them. Soon after the bell rang one team member was grimly grinning at me as she took one of my pieces and gave another back. While not violating the rules like her, most of us were also looking at everyone’s pieces to find the ones we needed.

Yet the man on my left was on a different path. He carefully looking around at each teammate’s set of pieces and then at his own. He would then give one of his pieces to someone, and put the one he received to one side. I was slow to understand his strategy but when I did I felt a surge of warmth towards him and imitated his approach. You see, instead of figuring out how fast he could complete his triangle by pulling the right pieces from others, he was helping them complete theirs by seeing which if his pieces would help each of them. Inevitably the leftovers in front of him would eventually form a triangle too.

Give and Become Sought-After 


Image Source: forbes.com
Our “team” won because of him, and I am certain I got accepted to the program on his coattails of connective leadership. Meeting him was a life-changer for me. That was years ago and Jim remains a hero and a friend of mine to this day. Organizational psychologist and Give and Take author Adam M. Grant would call him a successful giver and he has certainly proven to be.

Jim is widely admired and sought-after in many realms of work and life. From his studies, Grant would say that Jim, with practice in strategically helping others, has strengthened that selfless “giving muscle” we all have, thus also boosting his willpower and focus, becoming more productive in the use of his time and energy. (See the chocolate cookie/handgrip squeeze test described in Grant’s book).

Not all givers are successful. In fact some are the least productive, most unhappy people, according to Grant’s research. Most of us learn that lesson the hard way, and keep re-learning it.

Become the Kind Of Giver Who Gets the Most Success and Satisfaction

The priceless core lesson of Grant’s extraordinary book (my favorite on behavior since Quiet) is that we can become successful and lead a satisfying life with others if we learn the right way to give. This talented, widely-liked and introverted social scientist divides the world into givers, takers and matchers:

• The majority of us are givers, according to Grant, yet “are overrepresented at both ends of the spectrum of success.”

• “Takers seek to come out ahead in every exchange; they manage up and are defensive about their turf.

• Matchers expect some kind of quid pro quo, “with a master chit list in mind.”

What makes some givers successful and sought-after is that they have both a deep, evident caring for others, yet they also attend to their own self-interest. They are not “doormats.” Grant cites three relevant behaviors for being productive, happy givers:

Be judicious about giving to takers Give in ways that reinforce and support your most vital relationships. (You can’t serve everyone extremely well and care for yourself) Consolidate your giving into chunks of time with an individual or group so your support has a more substantial, meaningful impact From my experience a fourth point is also vital to delivering the most helpful value for others, and yourself:

Recognize the Need to Feel Needed and Connected

In art as in life it is often a matter of where you draw the line, the saying goes, and to succeed at work you need to draw a line to create healthy boundaries. Sacrificing your precious time with closest friends, colleagues and family members because you are devoting it to too many others may not be judicious choice for the self-care that Grant advocates.

As Susan Dominus observed in her New York Times article, Grant has a traditional marriage where “his wife “who has a degree in psychiatric nursing, does not work outside the home, devoting her time to the care time of their two young daughters and their home” and “works at least one full day on the weekend, as well as six evening a week, often well past 11.”

As an alternative model of healthy giving that reflects Grant’s definition of also taking care of oneself and “chunking” the helpful time with others, serial investor, Brad Feld has often written about how he gives and sets boundaries, becoming a role model in productivity. Feld helps many in the locally-based TechStars start-up communities, the start-ups in which he and his business partners invest, and boards on which he sits. He also scales his knowledge in his blog and co-authored books, and by providing open “office hours” to help most anyone.

In his self-caring approach to giving, he resolutely and publically sets aside specific vacation and other times with his wife, and for visiting with his parents, and closest friends – and for reading and running. A core theme running through Brad’s approach is connective, collective giving. That often means apt teams help others. This models behavior for those who receive to emulate, spurring them to enjoy the camaraderie of collectively giving, using their complementary talents with and for others an each other.

Help Others to Become More Helpful

We can feel that heady, immediate hedonic high each time we help someone who seeks our advice or an introduction, yet there may be surer ways to both support others and ourselves while also spurring them to emulate the giving behavior they receive. Those who continue to keeping getting the help they ask for, without any explicit expectation of reciprocity, may become habituated to asking for help; and thus inadvertently be turned into takers. Here are three models that I have experienced that spur a natural balance of give and take:

Give for the Greater Good of Our Team
Image Source: forbes.com

The triangles game gave visceral proof of the winning power of smartly giving to “our” team for the greater good of all the team. Whenever a team or organizational culture explicitly recognizes and rewards individual giving to the group, individuals seem to become more frequent and adept givers:

• Gore and Saddleback Church are frequently cited as examples of the connective, giving power of small, strong, inter-connected teams or groups within a larger organization.

• The specific rules of engagement of how Quantified Self members share self-monitoring experiments in their Meet-ups has enabled that self-organized group to scale global participation and innovation so rapidly and well that several universities and companies have sought them out as research partners.

• Mutual support communities thrive when they are centered around a strongly-felt, shared interest. Consider the giving behaviors, for example, in 12-step programs or groups for cancer survivors or avid cyclists. The popularity of these groups and the loyalty members feel to each other and their group, illustrate how we will generously give apt advice and help, not seeking a quid pro quo, when the shared mission, giving and camaraderie is evident.

• Other kinds of groups with explicit norms and rules to reinforce mutuality of benefits tend to spur greater sharing. They include MasterMind groups of peers or led by an expert such as Vistage groups,

Give Before Asking (We All have Something to Give)

Image Source: forbes.com
My friend Paul Geffner, has started several successful business with friends, from Captain Video (the first video rental store in S.F.) to Great Escape From New York Pizza. He is renowned for his generosity in giving advice to others who want to start their own business, yet one early lesson has held him in good stead when choosing those to help most. His first gig was selling finely made leather journals on a sidewalk near The Embarcadero, one of a string of street vendors on the same block. Some passersby would pause, pick up a journal, hold it and beging asking question after question about how to successfully start a street vendor business, sometimes even interfering with those who were attempting to buy a journal. Others would approach, look carefully at the selection, buy at least one and then ask how he got started, and what it would take. Which kind of person would most engender in you the desire to be helpful?

In attempting to emulate the kinds of giving I cite above, I may put myself somewhere in between the “giver and the “matcher” categories yet it appears to yield benefits. I have more time to recognize, maintain and savor my self-interest, as Grant advises, and to:

• Spend time with my dearest friends and family

• Hone my top talent, often around a sweet spot of mutual interest in a team of people with disparate, complementary talents where we can spur greater mutually learning and greater accomplishment together than we could on our own. For me, those experiences of shared giving and doing together create a more sustainable satisfaction, rather than the hedonic high moments which we — and those we help – can take for granted over time.

Use Your Best Talents With Others Who Are Too

Some of the most successful and satisfying times in my life have involved working with people from very different backgrounds, who same the same situation from a different perspective and who could do things well that flummoxed me. Here are two examples:

1. After giving a speech at a corporate conference, three self-described “analytics geeks” approached me about crafting a description of the forecasting tool they invented in a way that would grab the attention of their company CMO. After hearing their avid attempt to describe it to me I was intrigued and readily agreed to help. I suggested that we aim, instead, at convincing the CFO of its value to the company, as her support might make their tool even more credible to the C-suite. To appeal to the CFO, I enlisted the support of a generous friend who’s been a CFO at three firms. We all met for an afternoon and on into an evening (a chunk of time), as it took awhile for us, from our diverse professions, to actually understand each other. Yet time flowed by quickly as it was exhilarating to co-create the message for such an interesting project. We were all learning from each other. Not only did the three analytics pros prove successful in securing the support from the CFO, they have been helpful to me in my subsequent work with two start-ups. Giving in these ways reinforces the possibility that giving boomerangs back for all givers. It also boosts the chances that serendipitous support appears when you most need it sometimes – and that your giving is appreciated.

2. Because I frequently speak at conferences, a friend of mine asked me to attend a Toastmasters Club at San Quentin Prison, hoping I might have insights for the prisoners. It was a humbling experience. All of the presenters were more articulate, polished and passionate about their topic than me. And they were humble, helpful and respectful of each other. When the club leader asked me to offer them some helpful tips I acknowledged my awe of their skills and suggested that I could learn from them, since they were already better speakers than me. What if I provided role-playing coaching for them for the job interviews or other outside-of-prison situations they will face one day? I knew, in working with individuals whose life experience was vastly different than mine, that I could strengthen my core interest, connective communication skills, and I did. Two-way, simultaneous giving is extremely satisfying. As the Sufi saying goes, “God makes only co-equal partners.”

Feeling the connective power and support in giving in these two ways may also enable us to avoid the sometimes tragic consequences of “merging identity and work” described by CEO coach Jerry Colonna.

Grant Packs Many Actionable Insights Into Give and Take

His many thoughtful insights on productive giving can help us hone our approach. This is one of those books you will find yourself underlining every other sentence before giving up and recognizing it will become a handy guide to which you will return and re-read as situations crop up. All nine chapters were sequentially helpful, including these topics: How Givers, Takers, and Matchers Build Networks; How to be Modest and Influence People; Why Some Givers Burn Out But Others Are on Fire; and Overcoming the Doormat Effect. As Grant noted on his Facebook page (generously citing others, of course), “Ultimately, I focused on success because there has been surprisingly little written about how helpfulness influences productivity, work quality, promotions, and other objective measures of achievement and performance in organizations. By contrast, there are quite a few excellent books that deal with giving and happiness (see The How of Happiness by Sonja Lyubomirsky, Happy Money by Elizabeth Dunn and Michael Norton, The Happiness Project by Gretchen Rubin, and Why Good Things Happen to Good People by Stephen Post and colleagues).”

My Core Truths About Giving

1. Giving That Scales Serendipitous Opportunities

If you give enough other people the helpful support they need when they most need it, you often get helpful support when you most need it, sometimes even before you know you need it, and sometimes from those you didn’t know could provide it.

2. Giving That Takes Away Energy

• Some individuals give and give and give to you to fulfill their need to be known as caring people. They are not grounded in their giving so they can seem like unintended takers.

• One of the most uncomfortable situations is to have unhelpful help heaped on you by someone who will grow increasingly resentful that you aren’t returning the favor in equal measure. They are matchers disguised as givers.

3. Giving That Supports Our Best Sides

Two of the most satisfying ways to strengthen your core talent, using it more frequently with others are to:

1. Cultivate mutual-learning, supportive friendships with others of the same or similar talents

2. Collaborate with those who have complementary talents that dovetail with yours, working on projects that reflect sweet spots of strong shared interest.

Be inspired and learn ways on how to achieve success by visiting this Marc Accetta Facebook page.

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

REPOST: Gabrielle Bernstein: How to achieve unlimited happiness by making changes in your life


How can we achieve unlimited happiness in both our career and life? Dan Schawbel of Forbes.com shares his recent conversation with Gabrielle Bernstein, author of The New York Times bestseller " May Cause Miracles: A 40-Day Guidebook of Subtle Shifts for Radical Change and Unlimited Happiness."

Image Source: forbes.com
I recently spoke to the wondering Gabrielle Bernstein, who is the New York Times bestselling author of May Cause Miracles: A 40-Day Guidebook of Subtle Shifts for Radical Change and Unlimited Happiness. She also wrote Add More ~ing to Your Life and Spirit Junkie. She’s been featured on Oprah’s Super Soul Sunday as a next generation thought leader. Forbes named Gabrielle one of the Top 20 Best Branded Women and YouTube named her one of their Next Vloggers Gabrielle is also the founder of the social networking site HerFuture.com for women to inspire, empower and connect. Gabrielle has a weekly radio show every Wednesday on Hay House Radio and is a featured curator for Opensky. You can follow her on Facebook or Twitter @GabbyBernstein.

In this interview, she talks about how she’s developed her career, the biggest obstacles that she’s had, why she focused on spirituality, how people can get back on track in this bad economy and more.

You’ve created your own media empire over the years. How did you originally get into this career path and what were some of the biggest obstacles when you first started out?

I started my entrepreneurial journey right out of college. At the age of 21 I incorporated my first business, a PR firm based in New York City. I successfully ran that business with a partner for five years, but all the while I felt there was something missing. In 2005 I made major changes in my personal life that led me to shift gears. At that time I put down my PR business and began working as a life coach and speaker. I gave talks on what I was experiencing in my own life and shared the incredible lessons I was learning. Through my own spiritual journey I was guided to teach others how to crack open their authentic truth.

Over time, my lecture circuit grew. I witnessed a new Zeitgeist emerge: Young women were choosing real happiness over the party scene and fancy shoes. It has been a true pleasure to be at the forefront of this shift.

When selecting your field, why did you focus on spirituality and did you know that younger women would respond to it like the have?

I got started on my spiritual path when I was a kid. My mom taught me how to meditate and brought me to ashrams and spiritual circles. But I turned my back on spirituality for several years–until I hit a big bottom at 25 and had no choice but to return to my spiritual roots for help. I did just that. Since then, I have been on a steadfast journey inward as a self-proclaimed Spirit Junkie. As I grew spiritually I reclaimed a strong sense of self-respect and self-love, which is what led me to become an author and a speaker. My transition was very smooth because I was following my true purpose.

I believe that my work has been well-received because it is authentic. All people really want are authenticity and truth.

The bad economy has really ruined people emotionally and some have even given up on their job search completely. What are your recommendations to them? How can they get back on the right track?

When times are tough we have two choices: we can get sucked into fear or we can get creative. Fear is often our immediate response to uncertainty. There’s nothing wrong with experiencing fear. They key is not to get stuck in it. When we’re mired in fear, we feel like victims. We feel exhausted and helpless—or bitter and angry (or all of the above) because we focus on fear-based thoughts. Each thought we have influences our energy, and our energy makes the first impression on a job interview. My best advice for people looking to get out of the recession funk is to work through their fears and change their thoughts and energy. Everything else will flow from that.

In my new book, May Cause Miracles, I have an entire chapter dedicated to finance. Throughout the chapter I suggest several concrete ways you can change your mind about your experience. One example is to practice using the affirmation, I am not my lack mentality. I am not my lack mentality. Throughout the day, make an effort to be conscious of your recession fears. For instance, maybe your heart pounds every time you look at your bank statements. Or maybe you avoid negotiating for fear of not getting what you want, or because you’ve convinced yourself you’re not worth more. In the moment that you recognize your fear popping up, simply say (out loud or to yourself): I am not my lack mentality. This affirmation will remind you that you’ve merely chosen the wrong-minded approach to money, and that you can forgive yourself and change your thoughts. This practice will kick off the process of disconnecting from the fear.

Trust that by thinking or saying the words you’re creating a subtle shift that will move your focus away from fear. Remember that this path requires a moment-to-moment commitment to a positive perspective. That commitment will strengthen your faith in abundance one loving thought at a time.

In your book, you offer an action plan for people that takes 40 days. Why does it take that much time to bring out your best self? Does the amount of time required to transform your life change based on who you are?

Like any effective practice, true transformation occurs with daily repetition. Begin with a 40-day commitment and start experiencing positive results immediately. Why 40 days? Metaphysicians and yogis place much emphasis on the repetition of a 40-day practice. Mythical examples range from Moses’s 40 days and 40 nights in the desert to the story of the Buddha reaching enlightenment on the full moon in May after meditating and fasting under the Bodhi tree for 40 days. The number has scientific significance, too: research has shown that after repeating a new pattern for 40 days, you can change the neural pathways in your brain to create long-lasting change. So let’s take a cue from the mystics and scientists alike, and commit to this 40-day fear cleanse. It’s the simple, consistent shifts that count when you’re making change—so I’ve outlined May Cause Miracles to be fun and achievable. In the book I guide readers to keep it uncomplicated and stay on track. And one day at a time you’ll begin to experience the miraculous shifts.

What are your top three best pieces of career advice to those who are just starting out?
Image Source: forbes.com

1. Love what you do. Though this suggestion may sound cliche, it is the most important career advice I could offer anyone. When you love what you do, a power greater than you takes over. Passion creates purpose. When we live from a place of purpose, doors open effortlessly, money flows and incredible opportunities arise. The Universe supports you when you’re inspired.

2. Be authentic. There is nothing cooler than your authentic truth. Throughout my career the people who I’ve hired have been those who are honest and real. Don’t be afraid to be YOU. When you are yourself in a work environment or on an interview, all false pretenses lift and people feel connected to you. Everyone wants to feel connected, and when you are your authentic self, you offer them that opportunity.

3. Don’t be afraid to ask for more. Particularly during a recession, I see many people settling for less. Folks are plagued by the limiting belief that in tough economic times, “you have to take what you can get.” This fear-based belief system is not supporting the economy or your bank account. There is no harm in asking for more. Women in particular have a very difficult time negotiating and asking for what they want. Truth? The only way you’re going to get what you want is if you ask for it. It might make you uncomfortable to ask, but it’s important that you acknowledge that fear and discomfort … and ask anyway.



Marc Accetta has inspired many people to achieve their personal goals. He believes that to be successful, one must be able to shake off doubts and fears, improve self-esteem, and hone personal skills. If you want to become successful, follow this Twitter page for more self-improvement tips.

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

REPOST: 7 Things great employees do

If you think you know the difference between an average employee and a great one, think again. This CBSNews.com article talks about the seven things that great employees do.

Look, you've got to understand the reality here. People will cite ridiculously esoteric research studies and pull all sorts of popular, feel-good stuff out of their utopian behinds -- whatever it takes to get you to click. That's great for feeding your ego and your addiction to distraction, but it doesn't do squat for your career.

This is different. It's not some kumbaya fluff that will get you a big pat on the back, a "Nice job, buddy" from the boss, or a gift certificate for a cheap dinner. This is what employees really do to distinguish themselves in the eyes of management. It's how up-and-comers become up-and-comers. It's how you get recognized and moving up the corporate ladder. It's what today's top executives did when they were in your shoes.

Image Source: www.tradesmartu.com

Take responsibility for hot projects with a fearless attitude. And get this. If it works out, you don't waste a lot of time basking in the glory, at least not at work. Maybe you go out and celebrate with the other team members. That aside, you're all about finding the next big challenge. You're hungry for more. And if it fails, you don't point fingers. You take full responsibility and learn from it. And you know what? That's when management will start to see you as one of them. That's big.

Demonstrate natural leadership. That means when you take charge of something, people naturally follow, even though you don't have the title or the authority. Never mind everything you read; that's what natural leadership is really all about. There are all sorts of different styles that work, but mostly it comes down to a fearless self-confidence and charisma that people find magnetic. That's like gold in the corporate world.

Say, "Sure, no problem, will do," and then do it. It's one thing to have a solid work ethic and get the job done. That certainly key in the real business world. But it's another thing entirely to always accept challenging assignments with open arms and a simple, "No problem, will do" acknowledgement. And the tougher it is, the more confident you sound and the harder you work to make it happen. That's the sign of an employee who needs a promotion or two.

Image Source: blog.getresponse.com
Roll with the punches without taking things personally. Sure, it's hard to keep your balance when the rug's just been pulled out from under you. But let's face it. The nature of contemporary business is one of constant change, reorganizations and layoffs. Programs come and go. Companies too. One day you're rolling in resources, the next day you need three signatures for a chair. That's the way business is. And if you're flexible, you're adaptable, you've got fortitude and you don't take things personally, that's big.

Think of the company's goals as your goals. I know, the jaded among you will say that blind loyalty to a company will enslave you and get you nowhere. Well, there's truth to that. After all, any employee can be fired or quit, and that's as it should be. This is about understanding how companies operate and making the company's or the department's priorities your own. When you start to identify with the goals of management -- live, eat and breathe them -- then you start to become management. Yes, that's a good thing.

Do whatever it takes to get the job done, even when you're not getting paid for it. Look, success in the real world doesn't work like tit for tat. First, you put yourself out there, take risks, do the work, and accomplish things. Then, and only then, do you get to put your hand out and say, "Give me some." Then, if your company doesn't take care of you, you learn a lesson, put your accomplishments on your resume, and move on to a better place that values overachievers like you.

Grow the business or improve the bottom line. Yeah, I know it's not popular, but that doesn't make it any less critical or true. These days, it's all about doing more with less. Being more efficient, effective, scrappy, innovative, motivational, engaging, and not only that, happy about it. Think of it as a problem-solving challenge where the problem is how to grow the business or cut spending while improving productivity. Like it or not, that is what it's all about.

One of the most recognizable figures in the life coaching arena, Marc Accetta has inspired many people to face challenges, hurdle obstacles, and achieve personal success. Visit his website for more information.

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Five simple daily habits for a happy life in the office



In today’s busy world, work, deadlines, and a demanding boss can overwhelm employees. While committing errors is inevitable and can even serve as a lesson, fewer errors mean more chances of success in one’s professional life. Embracing best practice and adopting the following expert advice from certified life and career coach Ann Mehl can result to more ‘happy days’ in the workplace.

Improving physical health. A sluggish body leads to a laid-back attitude towards work. Mehl suggests taking the stairs instead of riding the elevator, or taking a 20-minute walk during breaks.


Image Source: sheknows.com.au


Spending emotional energy on important things. Discernment works when individuals spend their emotions on important things, rather than on trivial matters. Workers must surround themselves with positive energy by developing close ties with people who can inspire and uplift them.

Exercising the mind. People can learn new things every day by recalling facts, sorting information, and engaging in mental games. By engaging in mental activities, an individual is able to maintain a sharp mind.


Image Source: geriatriccaremanagement.com


Getting in touch with a ‘higher force.’ Connecting with something bigger and higher puts things in perspective. It doesn’t have to be about meditating for hours or even believing in a god. It can be done by being one with nature or just being grateful.

Reaching out to others. An old adage says that no man is an island. People need people. Whether they are close relatives or long lost friends, people are a reminder of the realities in life.


Image Source: mashable.com


With these pieces of advice in mind, no challenge is too big for the employee who wants to have a happy life in the office.

A lot of other pointers on how to live happily are available on this Marc Accetta blog.

Thursday, April 4, 2013

REPOST: The secret art of negotiating: Take your ego off the table

Successful businesses have a strategy  in everything they do. Nevertheless, these questions remain: How many people have a negotiation strategy? How does putting off one's ego help in achieving a successful negotiation? This Forbes.com article shares the details.
 

Image Source: forbes.com


Think negotiating is all bluff and bluster? Think again. According to Rony Ross, founder and executive chairman of Panorama Software, a provider of business intelligence software to 1,600 customers in 30 countries, the secret to successful negotiating is to take the ego out of the equation.

Ross developed this negotiating strategy early in her career. With an MBA and background in computer science, she was one of few women working in the high-tech space. “It was very competitive, predominantly male and full of young, egoistic people,” she recalls. “As a woman, I faced several disadvantages. Even though I was as ambitious as the rest, overt ambition or assertiveness was interpreted as aggressiveness.”

She developed a successful data-analysis software through her start-up Panorama, and in mid 1996, Microsoft came knocking. After a three-hour product demo, the Microsoft team took Ross out to lunch and offered to buy her company. “Panorama had only 20 employees then, and Microsoft was a giant company,” says Ross. “This was an extremely challenging opportunity for me to test my strategy.”

Not only did her negotiating approach work, Ross ended up with a decades-long partnership with the software giant. She says the technique serves any negotiation, from a raise request to a company buyout, and breaks down exactly how it works.

Keep The Discussion Results-Oriented

“You have to be very comfortable with yourself to deal with something without any ego, but it really works wonders for me,” says Ross. She recommends keeping the focus of the negotiation solely on results and what would make the best long-term deal for both parties. By taking the emphasis off the people involved and keeping it on the facts, the negotiation is less likely to become hostile. While it’s easy to take things personally—considering that most business negotiations hinge on assigning a value to you or your product—it’s important that you don’t confuse yourself with the issue.

Be Wise, Not Smart

“Always show respect and understanding for the other party,” Ross advises. Framing the negotiation around mutual interests rather than your interest alone helps both sides feel good about it. And if you’re respectful, it’s more likely the other side will reciprocate. Ross also recommends that negotiators “be wise, not smart.” Rather than looking for short-term gratification that bolsters the ego—like assuming a power posture or making a joke at another’s expense—keep your eye trained on the end result.

Put Your Concerns On The Table

Being the smaller party, Ross felt threatened by Microsoft. She worried it might not follow through with the deal and instead develop its own product, which would likely put her out of business. She decided to admit it. She voiced her fears and said, “I’m concerned, and I don’t know what to do about the situation.” The next day, the Microsoft team came back to her with statistics. Out of all the deals they’d started in the last year, they’d closed all but two. They also provided her with contact information of others who’d gone through the process with them, so that she could speak with them and feel more at ease. Says Ross, “Every time I ran into an issue, I turned it over to them and said, ‘I have a problem; help me deal with it.’”

Avoid “I” Statements

“I’ve been in so many negotiations with men who start with ‘I want this, and I want that,’” says Ross. “If you talk instead about how ‘we need to reach a solution,’ it’s a very different approach. It doesn’t gratify your ego requirements, but it reaches a much better deal.” Ultimately, she turned the deal into a technology acquisition and held on to her company. Ross also leveraged a long-term product development partnership with Microsoft, which wouldn’t have been possible had they left the table feeling bullied, offended or put off by how she handled it.

Engage With Your Body Language

Over the years, Ross has noticed that oftentimes people in negotiations lean back in their chairs rather than forward, which puts a physical distance between themselves and the other side. However, she tries to communicate openness and interest by sitting on the edge of her chair, placing her elbows on the table and leaning into the conversation. “With my words, eyes and body language, it’s all about engagement,” she says.

Follow this Marc Accetta Twitter page for more tips on unlocking your business potential.

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Business coaching: What it can do for a company and its employees



Business coaches, like Steve Fagan of Fagan and Associates and Marc Accetta of Marc Accetta Seminars, would agree that coaching has become one of the most powerful solutions in putting businesses on the right track to success. Business coaching can yield a lot of benefits. A company is not the only one that benefits from business coaching. Its employees will reap the benefits, too.


Image Source: smallbusinessmentorja.com


The following are just some of the benefits of business coaching:

• A company becomes more focused than before

• The employees become more motivated

• There is improved working relationship among members of the organization


Image Source: successbuilderseminars.com


• Human capital is enhanced

• There is sound understanding of business principles

• Individual potential, talents, and abilities are strengthened

• There is direct proportionality between customer service and the rate of productivity and level of quality.

Businesses looking for business coaches must remember, though, that coaching companies vary in their focus and strategy use. For Fagan and Associates, Inc., for example, life coaching is an established standard for professionalism, pushing organizations to the forefront of global commerce. Meanwhile, Marc Accetta Seminars advocates a combination of education and entertainment in inspiring individuals and helping them learn how to face challenges, making them succeed in their personal and professional lives.


Image Source: actioncoach.com


Having a business coach does not mean the business is taking desperate measures. Rather, it’s a strategic tool towards maximizing business solutions.

Know your business coaching options by visiting this Facebook page.

Sunday, March 17, 2013

REPOST: Does affirmative action do what it should?


What is "affirmative action"? How does it affect the educational and employment opportunities in every individual? This article from New York Times has the details.
 

Image Source: nytimes.com
WHAT’S more important to how your life turns out: the prestige of the school you attend or how much you learn while you’re there? Does the answer to this question change if you are the recipient of affirmative action?

From school admissions to hiring, affirmative action policies attempt to compensate for this country’s brutal history of racial discrimination by giving some minority applicants a leg up. This spring the Supreme Court will decide the latest affirmative action case, weighing in on the issue for the first time in 10 years.

The last time around, in 2003, the court upheld the University of Michigan Law School’s affirmative action plan. A divided court ruled, 5 to 4, that “student body diversity is a compelling state interest that can justify the use of race in university admissions.” Writing for the majority, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor said, “We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today.”

In the intervening period, scholars have been looking more closely at how affirmative action works in practice. Based on how they interpret the data that have been collected, some of these scholars have come to believe that affirmative action doesn’t always help the students it’s supposed to. Why? Because some minority students who get into a top school with the help of affirmative action might actually be better served by attending a less elite institution to which they could gain admission with less of a boost or no boost at all.

The idea that affirmative action might harm its intended beneficiaries was suggested as early as the 1960s, when affirmative action, a phrase introduced by the Kennedy administration, began to take hold as government and corporate policy. One long-simmering objection to affirmative action was articulated publicly by Clarence Thomas years before he joined the Supreme Court in 1991. Mr. Thomas, who has opposed affirmative action even while conceding that he benefited from it, told a reporter for The New York Times in 1982 that affirmative action placed students in programs above their abilities. Mr. Thomas, who was then the 34-year-old chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, didn’t deny the crisis in minority employment. But he blamed a failed education system rather than discrimination in admissions. “I watched the operation of such affirmative action policies when I was in college,” he said, “and I watched the destruction of many kids as a result.”

Scholars began referring to this theory as “mismatch.” It’s the idea that affirmative action can harm those it’s supposed to help by placing them at schools in which they fall below the median level of ability and therefore have a tough time. As a consequence, the argument goes, these students suffer learningwise and, later, careerwise. To be clear, mismatch theory does not allege that minority students should not attend elite universities. Far from it. But it does say that students — minority or otherwise — do not automatically benefit from attending a school that they enter with academic qualifications well below the median level of their classmates.

The mismatch theory, if true, would affect many kids. According to a 2009 book, “No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life,” by Thomas J. Espenshade and Alexandria Walton Radford, a black student with an otherwise similar application to a white student receives the equivalent of a 310-point bump in SAT scores.

Mismatch theory attracted little attention until 2005, when a law professor at U.C.L.A., Richard H. Sander, published a provocative article in the Stanford Law Review, which focused on how affirmative action affected law students. Mr. Sander claimed that “a student who gains special admission to a more elite school on partly nonacademic grounds is likely to struggle more” and contended that “if the struggling leads to lower grades and less learning, then a variety of bad outcomes may result: higher attrition rates, lower pass rates on the bar, problems in the job market. The question is how large these effects are, and whether their consequences outweigh the benefits of greater prestige.”

In other words, do the benefits of the connections made at, say, U.C.L.A. School of Law, and the weight U.C.L.A. carries in the job market, outweigh the cost of struggling academically there? Based on his reading of the data, Mr. Sander concluded that they did not.

Law school, as it turns out, is a somewhat natural, though imperfect, environment for studying mismatch effects. Law students have their knowledge tested in a fairly uniform way, first on the LSAT and then again, after graduation, on a state licensing exam, the bar.

MUCH of the squabble over mismatch centers on differing interpretations of the Bar Passage Study. The B.P.S. was commissioned by the Law School Admission Council in 1989 to determine whether blacks and Hispanics had disproportionately poor bar-passage rates. In 1991, more than 27,000 incoming law students — about 2,000 of them black — completed questionnaires for the B.P.S. and gave permission to track their performance in law school and later on the bar.

Among other things, the questionnaire asked students (a) whether they got into their first-choice law school, (b) if so, whether they enrolled at their first choice, and (c) if not, why not.

Data showed that 689 of the approximately 2,000 black applicants got into their first-choice law school. About three-quarters of those 689 matriculated at their first choice. The remaining quarter opted instead for their second-choice school, often for financial or geographic reasons. So, of the 689 black applicants who got into their first choice, 512 went, and the rest, 177, attended their second choice, presumably a less prestigious institution.

This data presented a plausible opportunity to gauge mismatch. The fact that 689 black students got into their first-choice law school meant that all 689 were similar in at least that one regard (though possibly dissimilar in many other ways). If mismatch theory held any water, then the 177 students who voluntarily opted for their second-choice school — and were therefore theoretically better “matched” — could be expected, on average, to have better outcomes on the bar exam than their peers who chose the more elite school. Mr. Sander’s analysis of the B.P.S. data found that 21 percent of the black students who went to their second-choice schools failed the bar on their first attempt, compared with 34 percent of those who went to their first choice.

The experiment is far from ideal. Mismatch opponents argue that there are many unobservable differences between second-choice and first-choice students and that those differences, because they’re unknown, cannot be accounted for in a formula. In the case of the B.P.S. data, maybe the second-choice students tended to have undergraduate majors that made them particularly well suited to flourish in the classroom and on the bar, regardless of which law school they attended. “All this work on mismatch assumes you know enough to write an algebraic expression that captures what’s really going on,” says Richard A. Berk, a professor of criminology and statistics at the University of Pennsylvania. “Here, there’s so much we don’t know. Besides, the LSAT is a very imperfect measure of performance in law school and thereafter, as is the bar exam.”

Daniel E. Ho, a law professor at Stanford, also disputes the mismatch hypothesis. In a response to Mr. Sander’s 2005 law review article, Mr. Ho wrote in the Yale Law Journal that “black law students who are similarly qualified when applying to law school perform equally well on the bar irrespective of what tier school they attend.”

Political changes in the ’90s created another opportunity to study mismatch. In 1996, California voters passed Prop 209, a ban on affirmative action. Critics of Prop 209 expected black and Hispanic enrollment at top University of California schools, like U.C.L.A. and Berkeley, to plummet — and it did, for a while. But these schools eventually saw increases in minority enrollment, particularly among Hispanics, as sophisticated new outreach programs kicked in. Enrollment has not, however, gotten back to pre-Prop 209 levels.

Recently, economists from Duke studied the effects of Prop 209, comparing undergraduate graduation rates for blacks, Hispanics and American Indians before and after the ban. In a paper being considered for publication by The Quarterly Journal of Economics, the Duke economists conclude that mismatch effects are strongest for students in so-called STEM majors — science, technology, engineering and math. These subjects proceed in a more regimented way than the humanities, with each topic and class building on what came before. If you don’t properly learn one concept, it’s easier to get knocked off track.

The Duke economists say that lower-ranked schools in the University of California system are better at graduating minority students in STEM majors. For example, they conclude that had the bottom third of minority students at Berkeley who hoped to graduate with a STEM major gone to Santa Cruz instead, they would have been almost twice as likely to earn such a degree.

“Prior to California’s ban on affirmative action,” Peter Arcidiacono, one of the study’s authors, told me, “what Berkeley did well was switch relatively ill-prepared minority students out of the sciences and into majors where credentials are relatively less important.”

SOON the Supreme Court will decide Fisher v. University of Texas. The case is complex, but essentially boils down to a young woman’s claim that U.T. violated the Constitution’s equal protection clause by denying her admission because she is white. The justices, save perhaps Clarence Thomas, are unlikely to address mismatch in their opinions. But the court could force schools to be more transparent about the racial preferences they use in admissions, and even to track the consequences for their students. For now, social scientists debate what can be gleaned from flawed data sets. They continue to argue over whether mismatch even exists and the extent of the harm it causes if it does. This raises another question: Do some of the more concrete if intangible benefits of affirmative action, like prestige and the superior connections one makes attending a fancier school, outweigh the potential cost? If affirmative-action admits are less likely to pass the bar after going to a certain type of school, or less likely to follow through with their field of choice, then the cost is potentially considerable. But are we really going to tell a kid embarking on adult life that he’s better off attending a less prestigious school?

“The real question is what we want affirmative action to achieve,” says Richard Brooks, a law professor at Yale. “Are we trying to maximize diversity? Engagement in the classroom? Whatever it is, I don’t think the purpose of affirmative action is for everyone to have average grades.” Mr. Brooks believes that mismatch exists. But he rejects the idea that it’s as insidious as others claim and says that some mismatch might even be a good thing. Striving alongside people more capable than we are is a key ingredient for growth of all kinds.

In the Fisher case, Messrs. Brooks, Berk and Ho signed a friend-of-the-court briefdisputing a brief on mismatch that was co-written by Mr. Sander and the legal journalist Stuart Taylor Jr. Messrs. Sander and Taylor also wrote a book together that was published last fall, “Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It’s Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won’t Admit it.”

“Mismatch angers affirmative-action supporters because it quantifies a downside without weighing it against potential upsides,” says Theodore Eisenberg, a law professor at Cornell, “such as the benefit of a diverse classroom, and the reality that some people who do attend better schools because of affirmative action are more successful in life as a result and help other minorities thrive.” Mr. Eisenberg is on the board of The Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, which in June is publishing a paper by E. Douglass Williams, an economist at Sewanee: The University of the South, that appears to corroborate Mr. Sander’s “first-choice/second-choice” analysis of the B.P.S. data.

In essence, affirmative action is about how to fairly distribute opportunity after our long history of racial discrimination. Whether it “works” is as much an issue for school administrators as for policy makers. That is, before we tell a student to choose School B over School A, it’s worth asking what schools can do to improve the experiences of students, particularly those pursuing STEM majors, who arrive less well prepared.

The upside of affirmative action might be harder to quantify. But part of the problem with the current affirmative action regime is how its supporters define the goal, what the Supreme Court calls the “compelling state interest”: classroom diversity. Meanwhile, little regard is given to the actual forms of adversity that disadvantaged students of all races must overcome. If affirmative action continues — either until Justice O’Connor’s 2028 horizon or beyond — then the results from California and the Bar Passage Study suggest it’s worth a closer, numbers-based look at the consequences, for everyone.

Have you ever felt ‘stuck’ or confused about what you should do? Have you ever wanted to achieve a new level of success in an area of your life that is already working for you? Visit this Marc Accetta Facebook page to learn how you can identify and achieve your personal goals.